Jupiter: improved resolution with a greater image scale/ pixel resolution (Niall MacNeill)

Jupiter: improved resolution with a greater image scale/ pixel resolution

Acquisition type: Lucky imaging

I produced this image of Jupiter this morning, under fabulous seeing conditions. I would say sub 1 are sec.

My focal length increaser the 2.5X Powermate is a beautiful lens, but I know that I am slightly under-sampling. That means spreading the detail over too few pixels. We magnify the image with a focal length increaser to make the image bigger to have enough pixels to show the detail without loss of resolution…following Nyquist. The formula, assuming the Dawes limit resolution of my scope which is 0.34 arc secs, says I need 2.8X. So I’m under-sampled. I also saw a lunar image recently where a 500m diameter crater was clearly resolved. That is 0.27”, so it is clearly possible to better than the Dawes limit…unsurprising in a way since he was looking through the atmosphere when he determined it.

Anyway, I decided to see if an increase in image scale/ pixel resolution would allow me to resolve finer detail. This of course means a longer focal length and greater magnification and to this end I bought a Tele Vue 3X Barlow lens.

I was very happy to have achieved the resolution you see in version B earlier in the morning, but it was nothing on what happened when I swapped out the 2.5X Powermate for a 3X Barlow, albeit under excellent seeing conditions.

Image C is a composite image that shows the comparison in resolution and it can be accessed with the mouse-over

Final
Original
B
C

B

Description: Earlier version with the 2.5X Powermate

Uploaded: ...

C

Description: A composite image which shows clearly the difference in resolution. Just to make the difference clearer I made this composite image between the two. Fortunately for comparison purposes, features that were on the left side of the CM when I took the images with the lower focal length had rotated to the right side of the CM by the time I had increased the focal length so that what you see here in the window at left has actually rotated to the right so a direct comparison can be made.

Uploaded: ...

	Distinct awarded users	Total awarded images
Image of the day
Top picks
Top pick nominations

	Image of the day	Top pick	Top pick nominations	Total submitted
Deep sky
Solar system
Extremely wide field
Star trails
Northern lights
Noctilucent clouds
Landscape

	Image of the day	Top pick	Top pick nominations	Total submitted
Backyard
Traveller
Own remote observatory
Amateur hosting facility
Public amaeteur data
Professional, scientific grade data
Mix of multiple sources
Other
Unknown

Submitted The date and time when you submitted this image for IOTD/TP consideration.	...
Views by Submitters (available since September 19th, 2023) Every image is assigned to 50% of available Submitters. In the event that at least 80% of them don't view the image before its time in the IOTD/TP process expires, it's assigned to the other 50% of Submitters and the process begins anew.
Promotions by Submitters When 3 distinct Submitters promote the image, it moves on to the next stage of the process: evaluation for Top Pick status. This requirement, in addition to anonymization of images and distribution to only a subset of them, prevents biases and ensures that the best images are selected.
Promotions by Reviewers When 3 distinct Reviewers promote the image, it moves on to the next stage of the process: evaluation for IOTD status.
Early dismissal Staff members have a lot of images to inspect on a daily basis, and they can dismiss images if they believe they don't meet the requirements for IOTD/TP selection. If an image is dismissed 5 times, it's removed from the process. This streamlines the process and ensures that any bias present in promotions could be overruled by other staff members.

Status	n/a
Started	n/a
Astrometry.net job	n/a
PixInsight job	n/a
PixInsight queue size	n/a
PixInsight stage	n/a

Image Index:

Contribution Index (beta):